And Now, Let Us Eat Cake

According to legend, in 1788, just a year before the onset of the French Revolution and but a mere five before she’d lose her head completely, Marie Antoinette responded to the news that French peasants were out of bread: “Let them eat cake.”

In reality, the phrase in French was “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche”–more accurately translated as “Let them eat brioche,” a different confection fortified with butter and eggs–and the historical evidence argues decidedly against the Queen’s having ever said it. Credible accounts depict Louis XVI’s wife as a woman who was neither as callous nor ignorant as the statement implies, who was in fact a generous patroness of charity moved by the plight of the poor in the run-up to the events that ended her life.

But my purpose here is not to conduct a seminar on historical accuracy. Rather, I bring it up to illustrate how popular understanding of events transpiring today can often be unhinged from reality itself.

Last Friday, news hit that Hostess Brands, the nation’s #2 bread baker and a company with more than $2.5 billion in annual revenues–makers of iconic American foodstuffs including Twinkies snack cakes and Wonder Bread–would ask a federal bankruptcy court for permission to close its operations. The company filed for bankruptcy a second time this past January, after a previous trip to bankruptcy court in 2004. It emerged from restructuring in 2009 after a four-and-a-half year process, controlled by hedge funds Silver Point Capital and Monarch Alternative Capital.

Two or three generations of commentators took to the Internet, decrying the imminent disappearance of the only food product ever to spare a man from the Electric Chair. Uncounted tweets lamented the denouement of one of the more widely lampooned products in American history.

And nearly everyone blamed Union Labor.

Read more…

Jesus Christ, People. It’s Not That Hard.

It seems fairly clear at this point: “the Internet” consists, for the vast majority of people in the United States anyway, of Facebook and Twitter.

By that I mean to say those two platforms comprise the portals through which a massive percentage of news, information, comment, and opinion passes–from which people go thither and yon to investigate or gawk or supplement whatever it is that first comes to their attention via Facebook and Twitter. Whether that’s a good or bad thing is neither here nor there, it just is. And as such, it seems reasonable to note every now and then when Facebook and Twitter gets overloaded with content about one thing or another.

Right now Facebook and Twitter are positively aflame with postings about MO. Rep. Todd Akin‘s recent remarks about “legitimate rape” and what women’s bodies may or may not be capable of with respect to the intimate dance between sperm and eggs.

There is also an increasing number of posts about the looming presidential election, the aggregate of which seems to confirm a definite polarization among the populace with respect to whether we are ruled by oligarchs or socialists (not to mention Muslims).

I’ve been thinking for a long while about the failure of the mainstream media to fulfill its watchdog role, to fulfill its role of informing the citizenry of the ways in which elected officials and institutions of government fall down on the job, making life–our understanding of it and our ability to solve its inherent difficulties–much more difficult than it ought to be.

I’ve been thinking, too, about the incestuous relationship between the mainstream media and the multinational corporations under whose auspices it operates–and the resultant game-rigging that ensures mainstream media cannot be trusted to provide truthful, germane reporting or information vital to the sustenance of an informed citizenry. That, however, is a topic beyond the scope of the present rant.

But the back and forth about Akin and about the race between Obama and Romney have me a little bit spooked. I mean, really, are we that far unhinged from reality that there’s even a debate about the heading we need to set sail on?

Don’t get me wrong. I am and have been from the near get-go a critic of Barack Obama and his highly compromising approach to leading the nation. But the so-called objectivity of the mainstream media that lends credence to bat-shit crazy notions of people such as Todd Akin and to Romney’s “bold” and “serious” Vice-Presidential nominee Paul Ryan makes me shake my head in wonder, and I tell myself: this is not my beautiful house; this is not my beautiful wife.

And then, as I do monthly, I go to my post-office box and pick up my copy of Harper’s Magazine. Soon, all is right in the world and I remember there are intelligent people in this country who work in publishing and who support the people working in publishing who work to give people the information and the perspective they need to go forth in this world and be not addled by the likes of FOX News or CNN or MSNBC or the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.

The September issue is a veritable treasure trove of well-crafted research and logic and persuasive argument that will leave you invigorated–if not necessarily optimistic–regarding almost every topic of conversation and opinion that so many butcher so badly day in and day out on Facebook and Twitter.

It’s available at news stands everywhere. Pick up a copy and let’s talk.

The Devil You Know

The Devil You know

I haven’t been completely disappointed by the GOP primary circus these past several months.

In the fall, things seemed so promising. We had the likes of Donald Trump, Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry still in the race–with Sarah Palin not yet totally out of it. But Ms. Palin proved no more than a chimera (go figure), and the other three, along with Mister 999–Herman Cain–each disappeared after one hot minute under the kleig lights of honest-to-goodness fact-checking and reasonably clear-eyed analysis that sometimes infects media coverage in a major political campaign.

So we’ve been left for months with just Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney trying to muster a challenge to Barack Obama from the disparate yearnings of, as Hendrick Hertzberg recently put it in the New Yorker,

[the] excitable, overlapping assortment of Fox News friends, Limbaugh dittoheads, Tea Party animals, war whoopers, nativists, Christianist fundamentalists, à la carte Catholics (anti-abortion, yes; anti-torture, no), anti-Rooseveltians (Franklin and Theodore), global-warming denialists, post-Confederate white Southrons, creationists, birthers, market idolaters, Europe demonizers, and gun fetishists

who make up the Republican “base” today.

Read more…

Congress Ponders Nerve Gas Solution to Gnat Problem

Some would just as soon have us return to Plato's Cave.

Prominent destinations on the Internet–including Google, Wikipedia, and Craigslist–went varying shades of “dark” Wednesday in a loosely coordinated effort to raise awareness of two bills currently making their way through the United States’ notorious “Do-Nothing Congress.” SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect Intellectual Property Act) are bills being considered in the House of Representatives and Senate (respectively) to address the contagion of copyright infringement apparently fostered by a free and open Internet.

However, as Julian Sanchez of the Cato Institute points out in a somewhat exhaustive analysis, the “problem” of copyright infringement seems hardly the kind of thing to rouse somnambulant legislators from a general stupor.

Part of the problem here, as Glenn Greenwald makes evisceratingly clear, is that people like former senator Christopher Dodd–who vowed when he retired from the business of legislating in 2010 to eschew the filthy lucre of the so-called “revolving door” between congress and the world of high-stakes lobbyists–has been elbowing his old pals in Washington in his new role as Chairman and CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), one of the loudest voices moaning about lost profits and stifled creativity supposedly attributable to Internet piracy.

Read more…

This is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things

Don't believe everything you read.

Arthur S. Brisbane has what one might think of as a pretty good job. He’s the Public Editor (or, what was once known as the “ombudsman”) at The New York Times. According to the job description posted on the Times‘ website, the Public Editor “responds to complaints and comments from the public and monitors the paper’s journalistic practices.” That is, he gets to represent the public interest (my emphasis) in what goes into “the newspaper of record.” Fully independent of the paper’s owners and publishers, the job description goes on to note, “(h)is opinions and conclusions are his own.”

Mr. Brisbane stepped in it Thursday, however, by penning a rumination on “journalistic practices” seeking reader input on the question whether Times reporters should serve as “truth vigilantes.”

That’s right. The ombudsman for the New York Times wonders whether it’s a good idea to require reporters to ascertain the veracity of the “facts” they report as news. Read more…

The Best is Yet to Come

Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines. The dark decade of the two thousand aughts is now a full year in the rear-view mirror and for some, the time has never been better to move forward with a foot on the gas. Read more…

My Thoughts on Steve Jobs

This post was originally published at Cult of Mac

When I heard about Steve Jobs’ resignation as Apple’s CEO on Wednesday afternoon I mentioned casually to a friend my assessment that “he’s probably the most influential human being of the past one hundred years.”

My friend laughed and said, “no way, you really think so?”

I challenged him to come up with someone more influential–and after a couple of minutes we agreed that Jobs’ influence on the course of human affairs has been something on the order of magnitude of Thomas Edison’s.

Another friend later ventured the opinion that the Dalai Lama or perhaps Adolph Hitler, or maybe Freud or Carl Jung had been more influential than Steve Jobs–but after having had more time to think about it, I’m sticking to my guns: in the past one hundred years, no single human being has had a greater influence on the way humans behave than Steve Jobs.

Read more…

My Dinner With Barack

Say what you will about Barack Obama, the brother keeps in touch.

I gave his campaign $50 shortly after it achieved inevitability in the spring of 2008, not long after I’d been laid off from my last secure, well, my last well-paying job — and about a year before the money ran out.

He’s kept me posted ever since.

Read more…

This Made My Head Explode

The Internet and technology continue to – in the immortal words of the great Muhammad Ali – stun and amaze ya, don’t they?

National Geographic has what, to the naked eye, appears to be a gorgeous, if somewhat pedestrian photo of the Grand Canyon on its website. It’s the photo you see pictured above.

What may cause your head to explode is what you’ll find by clicking in the yellow frame (which can be moved to any place on the photo) — it’s an infinite photograph, with seemingly every pixel being comprised of hundreds of other photographs, all submitted by users to the Geographic site, MyShot.

Wow. Just, wow.

Chart of the Day – The Lonesome Death of the American Worker

Labor's shrinking piece of the pie.

The chart above tells you just about everything you need to know about where we’ve been and where we’re going – as far as the U.S. economy is concerned, anyway.

The red line depicts American workers’ share of the national income pie, dating all the way back to 1947. As the boom and bust (or growth and retraction, if you must) nature of our capitalist economy worked its rhythmic gyrations over the years, Labor’s piece of the American Pie grew larger in good times, smaller in bad ones – but for the most part tended to recover to a baseline high of around 109 once the economy was good and cranking.

Read more…

Go to top