Jesus Christ, People. It’s Not That Hard.

It seems fairly clear at this point: “the Internet” consists, for the vast majority of people in the United States anyway, of Facebook and Twitter.

By that I mean to say those two platforms comprise the portals through which a massive percentage of news, information, comment, and opinion passes–from which people go thither and yon to investigate or gawk or supplement whatever it is that first comes to their attention via Facebook and Twitter. Whether that’s a good or bad thing is neither here nor there, it just is. And as such, it seems reasonable to note every now and then when Facebook and Twitter gets overloaded with content about one thing or another.

Right now Facebook and Twitter are positively aflame with postings about MO. Rep. Todd Akin‘s recent remarks about “legitimate rape” and what women’s bodies may or may not be capable of with respect to the intimate dance between sperm and eggs.

There is also an increasing number of posts about the looming presidential election, the aggregate of which seems to confirm a definite polarization among the populace with respect to whether we are ruled by oligarchs or socialists (not to mention Muslims).

I’ve been thinking for a long while about the failure of the mainstream media to fulfill its watchdog role, to fulfill its role of informing the citizenry of the ways in which elected officials and institutions of government fall down on the job, making life–our understanding of it and our ability to solve its inherent difficulties–much more difficult than it ought to be.

I’ve been thinking, too, about the incestuous relationship between the mainstream media and the multinational corporations under whose auspices it operates–and the resultant game-rigging that ensures mainstream media cannot be trusted to provide truthful, germane reporting or information vital to the sustenance of an informed citizenry. That, however, is a topic beyond the scope of the present rant.

But the back and forth about Akin and about the race between Obama and Romney have me a little bit spooked. I mean, really, are we that far unhinged from reality that there’s even a debate about the heading we need to set sail on?

Don’t get me wrong. I am and have been from the near get-go a critic of Barack Obama and his highly compromising approach to leading the nation. But the so-called objectivity of the mainstream media that lends credence to bat-shit crazy notions of people such as Todd Akin and to Romney’s “bold” and “serious” Vice-Presidential nominee Paul Ryan makes me shake my head in wonder, and I tell myself: this is not my beautiful house; this is not my beautiful wife.

And then, as I do monthly, I go to my post-office box and pick up my copy of Harper’s Magazine. Soon, all is right in the world and I remember there are intelligent people in this country who work in publishing and who support the people working in publishing who work to give people the information and the perspective they need to go forth in this world and be not addled by the likes of FOX News or CNN or MSNBC or the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.

The September issue is a veritable treasure trove of well-crafted research and logic and persuasive argument that will leave you invigorated–if not necessarily optimistic–regarding almost every topic of conversation and opinion that so many butcher so badly day in and day out on Facebook and Twitter.

It’s available at news stands everywhere. Pick up a copy and let’s talk.

The Devil You Know

The Devil You know

I haven’t been completely disappointed by the GOP primary circus these past several months.

In the fall, things seemed so promising. We had the likes of Donald Trump, Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry still in the race–with Sarah Palin not yet totally out of it. But Ms. Palin proved no more than a chimera (go figure), and the other three, along with Mister 999–Herman Cain–each disappeared after one hot minute under the kleig lights of honest-to-goodness fact-checking and reasonably clear-eyed analysis that sometimes infects media coverage in a major political campaign.

So we’ve been left for months with just Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney trying to muster a challenge to Barack Obama from the disparate yearnings of, as Hendrick Hertzberg recently put it in the New Yorker,

[the] excitable, overlapping assortment of Fox News friends, Limbaugh dittoheads, Tea Party animals, war whoopers, nativists, Christianist fundamentalists, à la carte Catholics (anti-abortion, yes; anti-torture, no), anti-Rooseveltians (Franklin and Theodore), global-warming denialists, post-Confederate white Southrons, creationists, birthers, market idolaters, Europe demonizers, and gun fetishists

who make up the Republican “base” today.

Read more…

My Thoughts on Steve Jobs

This post was originally published at Cult of Mac

When I heard about Steve Jobs’ resignation as Apple’s CEO on Wednesday afternoon I mentioned casually to a friend my assessment that “he’s probably the most influential human being of the past one hundred years.”

My friend laughed and said, “no way, you really think so?”

I challenged him to come up with someone more influential–and after a couple of minutes we agreed that Jobs’ influence on the course of human affairs has been something on the order of magnitude of Thomas Edison’s.

Another friend later ventured the opinion that the Dalai Lama or perhaps Adolph Hitler, or maybe Freud or Carl Jung had been more influential than Steve Jobs–but after having had more time to think about it, I’m sticking to my guns: in the past one hundred years, no single human being has had a greater influence on the way humans behave than Steve Jobs.

Read more…

WikiLeaks Proves DC Rancor is a Sham

Jayzus H. Christ, I go away from the Internet for a while and all hell breaks loose.  

Having shimmied back down the rabbit hole in the last couple of days, my eyes are now bleeding from reading all the sturm und drang over supposed terrorist/sex criminal Julian Assange and his pariah website, WikiLeaks.

OK, they’re not bleeding but my eyes are tearing up and I wish my head didn’t hurt the way it does from trying to piece together the cognitive disconnect over so many people not caring that the US has been waging multiple illegal wars and torturing innocent people for going on a decade, and now are suddenly turning into a rabid mob over the revelation that many things thinking people have long suspected of modern government S.O.P. turn out to be true. Read more…

This is How the Terrorists Won, Pt.2

I was speaking not long ago with a former law school classmate and we were ruminating on how the most sacrosanct constitutional right had come to be not the right to privacy — only the most naive among us ever believed that one — nor the right to Life (certainly not in the last remaining First World nation to still execute its prisoners), but the right, or freedom, to travel.

Interestingly enough, the Supreme Court didn’t enshrine it so out of beneficent respect for any freedom of the individual but rather as a vehicle for upholding the state’s authority to regulate (read: promote) interstate commerce.

Be that as it may, the eventual resolution of the ACLU’s lawsuit on behalf of 17 U.S. citizens and legal residents challenging their placement on the U.S. government’s No-Fly List and the failure of the government to give them a chance to defend themselves ought to be pretty interesting.

Read this sad tale to understand just one more reason why you ought to have little confidence an any assertion that says your constitutional rights have not diminished in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

And don’t think it couldn’t happen to you.

Happy Anniversary

To commemorate the 9th anniversary of the US invasion of Afghanistan, the American Friends Service Committee is sponsoring an exhibit of art entitled Windows and Mirrors — Reflections on the War in Afghanistan.

The exhibit, compiled from the work of more than 40 artists from around the world (including US and Afghan students), offers an opportunity to reflect on our identity as a nation at war.

The Arch Street Meeting House in Philadelphia hosts today’s opening; the exhibit will travel to New York in December and on to California and elsewhere in the new year.

I wrote this piece nine years ago, on the eve of the invasion.

How Low Can You Go?

This post was originally published at OpenSalon, a beta-test group blogging project of Salon Media.

I‚Äôm going to think out loud, if you don‚Äôt mind. I‚Äôve been ruminating on something for a while now and I would like to indulge the openness and apparent civility of this forum to throw some very incompletely formed ideas against the wall to see what sticks. Maybe we‚Äôll end up with a collective Rorschach test that can tell us something about ourselves, or maybe, as with making so much spaghetti back in college, we‚Äôll just end up with strands of uncooked pasta and a mess on the kitchen wall. Read more…

Who Loves Ya, Baby?

The true origins of celebrating the notion of romantic love on February 14 are not well documented, though the exchange of elaborate, handmade gifts between paramours was well established by the middle of the eighteenth century in England, and began to really take off in the United States once Esther Howland (herself now considered something of a saint by the American Greeting Card Association) began selling mass-produced Valentine’s cards in the 1840s.

An estimated one billion Valentine’s cards are sent each year, with a surprisingly negligible effect on the degree of love or open-heartedness in the world. Read more…

A Wing And A Prayer

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke responded to worldwide stock market declines of 5% Monday with a 75 basis-point cut in the Fed Funds rate Tuesday morning. The Fed’s largest single rate cut in 23 years was more notable for its coming just a week before the regularly scheduled meeting of the Fed Board of Governors on January 30.

U.S. markets reacted by trimming massive losses at the opening bell, closing off by only an increasingly common 1% on the day. Read more…

Update on Freedom’s March

It’s been called “the defining struggle of our time” by the rootin’-tootin’est vice president this country has ever had. Faced with criticism over his policies, or doubt concerning progress in the so-called War on Terror, our least-popular president ever invariably fends off nattering nabobs of negativism with one of his own favorite mantras: “freedom’s on the march.”

In this, the season of gratitude, as we prepare to “celebrate” a holiday conceived in the spirit of thanks for the bounties of Providence, why not check-in on freedom’s march, and try to gauge its progress toward Valhalla? Read more…

Go to top